[wfs-dev] SRS of LatLongBoundingBox

[David McCullough]

Glad to here that I wasn't the only one confused.

As for the tests, I'm a little scared, too. My WFS generates the schema
and capabilites dynamically as well, and puts everything in our own
namespace. Also, our layers (TypeNames) can have only geometry property,
and this is always called SHAPE. I'm sure I'm going to run into trouble
here. Oh well, I'll create another thread for this when the time comes,
as this is starting to get off topic.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Fitzgerald [mailto:jeff.fitzgerald at caris.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:18 AM
To: David McCullough; Wfs-Dev (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [wfs-dev] SRS of LatLongBoundingBox


Hey David,

I had the same confusion you did regarding the wording, especially
having
come from the WMS spec that has a <LatLonBoundingBox> element and a
<BoundingBox> with an SRS attribute. Maybe this could be clarified in
future
specs.

Also, I'd been interested to know how you make out with the tests. My
WFS
generates the capabilities and schema documents on-the-fly on a request
by
request basis. There were enough discrepancies in the response documents
due
to namespaces and what not that some of the test were difficult to
resolve.

Cheers,

Fitz

----- Original Message -----
From: "David McCullough" <dmccullough at questerra.com>
To: "Wfs-Dev (E-mail)" <wfs-dev at opengis.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 11:18 PM
Subject: RE: [wfs-dev] SRS of LatLongBoundingBox


> Alex,
>
> Yeah, I have my server coded up to return EPSG:4326 (even though our
> features are in a projected coordinate system). However, what got me
> questioning things again was looking at the GetCapabilities response
in
> the WfsCapabilities.xml file that is included wfsTestData1.0.0.zip
test
> data from OGC CITE. This test file has XML like this:
>
> ...
>       <wfs:SRS>EPSG:32615</wfs:SRS>
>       <wfs:LatLongBoundingBox minx="500000" miny="500000"
maxx="501000"
> maxy="501000"/>
> ...
>
> Clearly, these coordinates are not lat/long degree values, so is this
> sample data incorrect?
>
> Thanks.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aleksandar Milanovic [mailto:risjak at telus.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 6:45 PM
> To: David McCullough; 'Wfs-Dev (E-mail)'
> Subject: RE: [wfs-dev] SRS of LatLongBoundingBox
>
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> LatLongBoundingBox coordinates are *not* bound to the SRS of the
feature
> type declared in the Capabilities document. Rather, they are in
> EPSG:4326
> with decimal degrees as units, if I remember well :).
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wfs-dev-bounces at opengis.org [mailto:wfs-dev-bounces at opengis.org]
> On
> Behalf Of David McCullough
> Sent: August 31, 2004 5:59 PM
> To: Wfs-Dev (E-mail)
> Subject: [wfs-dev] SRS of LatLongBoundingBox
>
>
> This question concerns the optional <LatLongBoundingBox>[s] that may
be
> returned in the <FeatureType> elements of a GetCapabilities response.
> I'm
> having some confusion about what SRS the coordinates should be
relative
> to.
>
> The WFS-capabilities.xsd schema file says that a <LatLongBoundingBox>
> should
> indicate the edges of the enclosing rectangle in the SRS of the
> associated
> feature. That seems clear, but then why is the element called
> LatLongBoundingBox? That seems to me to imply that the coordinates are
> geodetic, regardless of the associated feature's SRS. Which is
correct?
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Dave
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wfs-dev mailing list
> wfs-dev at opengis.org http://mail.opengis.org/mailman/listinfo/wfs-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wfs-dev mailing list
> wfs-dev at opengis.org
> http://mail.opengis.org/mailman/listinfo/wfs-dev
>