[wfs-dev] Extra Key/value Pairs on a GetFeature
Panagiotis (Peter) A. Vretanos
pvretano at cubewerx.com
Mon Oct 30 10:00:48 EST 2006
John,
Yes this is acceptable as long as the request is still valid if the
additional parameters are ignored. If I remove the non-standard
parameters from your request I am left with:
http://...some_server.../wfs.php?SERVICE=WFS&REQUEST=GetFeature&VERSION=1.1.0&TYPENAME=gmlSimpleFeatureType
which is a perfectly valid request that any WFS could process (although
you would likely get a exception about 'gmlSimpleFeatureType' not existing).
You would advertise the additional capabilities using the
"ows:ExtendedCapabilities" element.
Ciao.
John Schattel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm developing a WFS and am planning to require the client to provide
> additional input information (see example below) with its GetFeature
> request. Is this acceptable for a WFS implementation?
>
> http://host/GMLgen/server/ndfdGMLserver.php?SERVICE=WFS&REQUEST=GetFeature&VERSION=1.1.0&lat=38.99&lon=-77.99&time=2006-10-30T00%3A00%3A00&elements=maxt&TYPENAME=gmlSimpleFeatureType&
>
> Would this additional input requirement be specified in the
> <ows:AccessConstraints> element of the GetCapabilities document or is
> there a better way?
>
> Thanks.
>
> John
> _______________________________________________
> wfs-dev mailing list
> wfs-dev at opengeospatial.org
> https://mail.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/wfs-dev
>
--
Panagiotis (Peter) A. Vretanos CubeWerx Inc.
Big Kahuna (Senior Database Developer) http://www.cubewerx.com
Tel. 416-701-1985 Fax. 416-701-9870 pvretano at cubewerx.com
"If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first
create the universe." -- Carl Sagan
More information about the wfs-dev
mailing list