[wfs-dev] WFS-Basic naming

[Clemens Portele]

Raj,

besides the fundamental concerns raised by Simon and Rob about the contents
of a potential "WFS basic" spec there are also more trivial issues about the
naming. To me it would be confusing and difficult to communicate that a "WFS
basic" is not a WFS. Also, WFS defines a "Basic WFS" which has nothing to do
with "WFS basic".

Clemens

> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> wfs-dev-bounces+portele=interactive-instruments.de at opengeospatial.org
> [mailto:wfs-dev-bounces+portele=interactive-instruments.de at ope
> ngeospatia
> l.org]On Behalf Of Raj Singh
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 9:09 PM
> To: wfs-dev at opengeospatial.org
> Subject: [wfs-dev] WFS-Basic naming
>
>
> There is an emerging data service specification targeted at
> mainstream, generic data platforms being developed at: http://
> www.ogcnetwork.net/wfsbasic.
>
> I wanted to query this group on whether anyone would 'offended' by a
> spec with WFS in the name that didn't mandate GML support. Comments?
>
> thanks,
> Raj
> _______________________________________________
> wfs-dev mailing list
> wfs-dev at opengeospatial.org
> https://mail.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/wfs-dev